Re: [draft] Module decisions for GNOME 2.14

Sorry, one more nitpick, this time with what I said

On 2/10/06, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com> wrote:
> How about just saying that it depends on libsexy which there doesn't
> appear to be consensus to include?  Possibly also mention (a) there
> appeared to be some strong support behind it and we'd love to see it
> integrated early next cycle (assuming the libsexy issue can be
> resolved)

...with some updated HIG guidelines on the usage of notifications...

> and (b) it was actually an invalid proposal according to
> the GEP as it was not proposed (nor even commented on) by the author
> -- which is possibly part of the reason for the late discovery and
> discussion of issues like libsexy.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]