2006/7/21, Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com>:
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 11:43 +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > I'm planning on running it with other theme engines too of course. It would be good to know how other them engines behave on the 770.
Absolutely, so that's why I grabbed the gtk-engines 2.6.9 package (oldish, yes, but I needed to compile for GTK+ 2.6 too so...) and ran the (admittedly limited set of) GtkPerf tests with 8 of them (all or at least almost all of them?). Compiled with vanilla 2.6 and 2.10 and the maemo-GTK+. So when you add the three builtin theme runs and one with the sapwood engine, you get a total of 28 different theme/GTK+ setups, all of them with 14 results plus a total time spent. Needless to say, that spells "a lot of data". In fact, it seems to be a bit too much to show in one chart in any reasonable way. I have tried to think of a better way to show the data, but failed so I'll just post the huge all-in-one chart and let anyone interested to cut the interesting pieces to more reasonable ones from the .gnumeric :) There is some very interesting results there (read: bad performance), and once I get the sysprof properly running on 770 I'll hopefully be wiser on the "why":s too. Some notes on the chart: - The results are relative to vanilla GTK+ 2.6 builtin theme (the scale was too large for absolute numbers) - The thick line is "1" as in "in par with GTK+ 2.6 builtin theme" - Anything over the line is BAD and under the line is GOOD - Relative numerical data is on the second tab in the .gnumeric - Raw figures are in the third tab, in seconds as the GtkPerf reported them -- Kalle Vahlman, zuh iki fi Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
Attachment:
GTK+ theme engines on 770.png
Description: PNG image
Attachment:
GTK+ theme engines on 770.gnumeric
Description: application/gnumeric
