Re: Floating point in pango



28 Jul 2006 04:08:30 +0200, Soeren Sandmann <sandmann daimi au dk>:
Matthew Allum <mallum openedhand com> writes:

> But I think the difference here is, and a point you've very well made,
> is sysprof is designed for desktop type hardware - thats not (usually)
> ARM. On ARM we *need* features that oprofile gives us like use of
> hardware foo to lower overhead and the data collection separation.
> Porting sysprof to ARM as to be useful would likely break your original
> design goals.

I wouldn't say that sysprof is designed for desktop type _hardware_,
as much as it is designed for desktop developers. After all, an ARM of
today is as powerful as a desktop not that many years ago, and sysprof
actually goes to quite some length to limit the amount of CPU and
memory it uses.

Yes, it (the module) indeed seems to work just fine on ARM. When I get
the symbol resolving working too I'll be able to tell if the overhead
is meaningful or not.

--
Kalle Vahlman, zuh iki fi
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]