Re: [orca-list] gnome 3.16 vs 3.18 which one is more accessible?

["B. Henry" <burt1iband gmail com>]

As far as I have noticed both should work, but I do not use gnome all that much so there may be some 
difference in notifications reading I've missed.
For sure you should enable the accessability PPA that has been posted here a few times by Luke and others I 
think so you can always have a very recent 
orca, and often newer versions of other accessability stack conponents that can make our lives better.
Kendell and a couple other guys likely can fill in exactly what accessability bugs effect each gnome release.


-- 
     B.H.
   Registerd Linux User 521886


  Krishnakant wrote:
Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:56:32PM +0530

> hello all,
> The subject line says it all.
> To elaborate, I am going to try out Ubuntu 15.10 and I am aware that it
> comes with Gnome 3.16 by default.
> But I can upgrade to 3.18 using the Gnome PPA I guess.
> So I wish to know which should be the right version of Orca and right
> version of Gnome for a production machine?
> My requirement is to access wifi points, read battry status, use calc
> (spreadsheet) or some one word processor.
> I use Eclipse Luna which is pretty accessible.
> The menus should be accessible and I often need to read PDF files.
> alerts, such as wifi connection notifications, and pidgin notifications
> should be announced.
> Volumen control and system settings need to be accessible.
> With this use case in mind, can some one suggest out of experience?
> Happy hacking.
> Krishnakant.
>
> _______________________________________________
> orca-list mailing list
> orca-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
> Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
> GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
> Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org