Re: [orca-list] Is the manjaro installer accessible?



Thanks for the response. I'm using fedora on a laptop right now for a
linux command line course i'm taking. But i like options, but if lack
of accessibility backs me in to a tight corner, i get pretty
frustrated. From my point of vies, linux is about choice, and i think
disabled or otherwise, we should all have the same options that our
fellow linux users have, whether you want to use ratpoison, fluxbox,
or KDE, and it shouldn't matter which distro is chosen. Of course that
is just my oppinion.

On 3/5/15, B. Henry <burt1iband gmail com> wrote:
Arch may break stuff, but I have never seen it break accessibility. You can
always freeze some packages from updating if you have specific fears, but
speakup is in all the kernels, and orca  updates would only effect some
functionality if you choose the orca-git package in the AUR where clearly
you
are working with development versions. The at-spi packages do  mostly have
git options as well, but I have mostly run the stable branch versions,
mostly
in extra or commnunity repos, same with speech-dispatcher, although I did
use the AUR version for a while. Again, I have had arch breakage, but
accessibility has never been the issue. Some packages may requiure some
initial configuration to get the most accessible interface, but those
configurations are not overwritten with updates.
You can add repos to get your proprietary firmware if you wish to use
Debian.
Manjaro has more than one version as I recall, but I do not know if they all
use the same installer or not.
Ubuntu will give you out of the box hardware support for most machines, so
as Kyle states it is also a good option.
Orca is a gnome project, so it is hardly a surprise that it concentrates on
gnome. XFCE devs seem to be generally overwhelmed, and have given up on
accessibility for the moment, proablyh the year anyway. Mate cares, and Orca
has made the minor adaptations required to help it be a very good
alternative.
My suggestion is to contact those in charge of any desktop you wish to use
and ask about accessiility, and  make specific suggestions if things are far

enough along to do that.
If you do not mind installing a new OS frequently then Fedora is an option
as well, and I know some folks using Gentoo, but you need to know your stuph

before jumping in there, more so than with arch which requires more time and
knowledge than the other options mentioned.



--
     B.H.
   Registerd Linux User 521886


  austinAustin quesada wrote:
Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:56:00PM -0800

Hi list. While i think sonar is great, i was wondering if manjaro
itself has orca built in? If not, could you guys advise on a distro
that is not debien based? I know people usually advise ubuntu or gnome
as the default desktop. I'm admittedly a bit frustrated that linux
accessibility appears to be singularly focused on the gnome project,
or Ubuntu. While arch is a great option, my concern is that it's
frequent updates have the possibility of breaking accessibility. Sorry
for my rant, but i'm basically looking for a distro that doesn't use
gnome as the default, but could still work with orca, whether through
an installer, or the command line. So, what are my options? The reason
i brought up Debien is because, it seems to have issues with most of
my hardware, because i seem to need a lot of proprietary firmware and
drivers. Thanks for any advice, and thanks for reading.
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]