[orca-list] Misteries of low performance of Orca and distros
- From: Luciano de Souza <luchyanus gmail com>
- To: orca-list gnome org
- Subject: [orca-list] Misteries of low performance of Orca and distros
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:55:03 -0300
Hi listers,
I am using Orca 3.2.0 and Ubuntu 10.10, but I really need to upgrade it.
However, I am facing severe issues about performance. I have a Entel I5
processor with 4 gigabytes of RAM. It's not a bad machine, but, under
Linux environment, the performance has never been good.
Under Ubuntu 10.10 and orca 3.2.0, the performance is acceptable, but
when Windows is run in the same machine, the difference is immeasurably
big. Windows is much faster.
The problem seems to be more severe in my attempts to upgrade. let me
show you my failed instalations:
1. Sonar (ubuntu 12.04) - After the instalation, the performance is very
bad compared to Windows and the current distro (ubuntu 10.10). I don't
know if I would be pacient with so weak performance, but the true reason
I uninstalled it is that there is a problem with portuguese translation
package.
2. Vinux (Ubuntu 12.04) - For three times, I tried to install it.
Firstly, the installer failed with an unknow error 5. Secondly, it was
reported that the media was probably corrupted. Thirdly, error 5 was
shown again. I used three different medias, so it's not easy to suppose
media corruption. The DVD unit seems to be working appropriately becose
I can run and install Ubuntu 10.10 without problems. But the important
for the purpose of this message is that I could not install Vinux, but
the installer works efficiently in terms of performance.
3. Ubuntu 13.04 - The slowness was so critical during the instalation
that Orca answered after 10 or 15 seconds after a command. I don't refer
to the natural time consumption for the DVD scanning. No, it seems to be
related to the RAM. I can't understand what is wrong.
Is ubuntu a very slow system? No. I can't listen to people complaining
about this.
Is my computer broken? No. Windows is running with a very, very good
performance.
Could I have a hot processor? It's always a possibility, but when I
place the hand on the refrigeration output, I can feel the wind. I can
additionally regard that hardware problems certainly would affect also
Windows and, as I have mentioned, windows is running so faster.
The fact is that orca, under Sonar (ubuntu 12.04), did not answer
timely. And ubuntu 13.04, during the instalation, the issue was
meaningly worst.
I do really want to use newer versions of Orca. From Saturday to Sunday,
I tried to install Vinux and Ubuntu 13.04 for six five times and six
reinstalations of Ubuntu 10.10 was needed, totalizing 11 instalations.
Yes, I am really dedicated to complete the task.
However, a mistery keeps unknown: why can I get good performances if my
machine is able to deal with it?
If the reason keeps unknow, the solution is to try something different.
I can try to install Vinux, since the problem was not related to
performance up to now.
I can insist with Ubuntu 13.04, expecting that after instalation its
behavior will be much faster.
But I can also try to use another distro, perhaps, a non Debian distro.
So I ask:
1. Do you have any idea what I can do to discover what badly affect the
performance of my machine when I use Ubuntu?
2. Which distros I can install without any help of a sighted people?
I sent this message to the orca list becose my purpose is find any
alternative that allows orca to work efficiently. Therefore, it's not aa
specific doubt about one distro. Actually, it's important for me to
choose a distro accessible during the instalation and with newer and
faster orca versions.
Regards,
Luciano
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]