Re: [orca-list] [Kde-accessibility] Ubuntu Unity Desktop to go to Mir and QT



I'll create a virtual machine and begin testing before the month is up.  Do
I need to have something like Fedora Rawhide or Ubuntu 13.10 to test in an
environment that will give you valuable data?  

Alex M


-----Original Message-----
From: Frederik Gladhorn [mailto:frederik gladhorn de] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:35 AM
To: kde-accessibility kde org; 'Ubuntu Accessibility Mailing List';
orca-list gnome org
Cc: Alex Midence; 'Krishnakant Mane'
Subject: Re: [orca-list] [Kde-accessibility] Ubuntu Unity Desktop to go to
Mir and QT

Onsdag 24. juli 2013 08.47.34 skrev Alex Midence:
Very true.  The thing that I want to test is editable text areas in QT.
That was the biggest problem I saw last year when I was trying out 
KDE.  If you were in Kate or Kmail and there was some text you wanted 
to put in either because you were editing a file or filling out a form 
of some kind, Orca couldn't read it back to you.  If it was a field 
you were filling in, you could tab away and backtab back to it and 
Orca would speak its contents but, individual character by character 
or word by word navigation was not possible at the time.  I hope 
that's gotten better since then.  I haven't looked at it since May or 
June of last year, I think.  It is a very important piece of the puzzle.

For Kate it would be great if I could get bug reports with an easy
description on https://bugs.kde.org .

Another interesting thing to try would be Qt Creator - which is probably
quite complex to test, but for me the editor pretty much works with Orca. Or
as a simpler test the text editor example that is shipped with Qt 5
(examples/widgets/richtext/textedit). In general using one of the many
examples shipped with Qt makes it easier for me to reproduce bugs, feel free
to file Qt accessibility bugs on https://bugreports.qt-project.org and make
sure to choose "Gui: Accessibility" as component.

Generally the text interfaces should be much better in Qt 5 compared to Qt
4, but need some testing.

KMail is using WebKit and is not expected to work all that great (even
though Jose made it work much better than before).

Greetings
Frederik




Alex M



From: Krishnakant Mane [mailto:krmane gmail com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:42 AM
To: Alex Midence
Cc: 'Frederik Gladhorn'; kde-accessibility kde org; 
vinux-support googlegroups com; 'Ubuntu Accessibility Mailing List'; 
orca-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [orca-list] [Kde-accessibility] Ubuntu Unity Desktop to 
go to Mir and QT



This essentially means we must try things pretty early on and start 
reporting bugs agressively.
happy hacking.
Krishnakant.

On 07/24/2013 06:37 PM, Alex Midence wrote:

Wonderful news!  I certainly feel better for it.  Thanks for all your 
hard work on qt-at-spi.



Alex M





From: Frederik Gladhorn [mailto:frederik gladhorn de]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:21 AM
To: kde-accessibility kde org
Cc: Alex Midence; orca-list gnome org; vinux-support googlegroups com; 
Ubuntu Accessibility Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Kde-accessibility] Ubuntu Unity Desktop to go to Mir and 
QT



Hello,



On Tuesday 23. July 2013 13.23.47 Alex Midence wrote:


Hi, all,















It looks like Ubuntu's Unity desktop will be switching to QT/QML in 
the

near


future. It looks like they'll be using QT5. Does anyone know the 
current



state of accessibility for qt5 or QML? We were all disappointed to 
find



out that Unity 2d was discontinued in Ubuntu 12.04 and it is believed 
that



Ubuntu 14.04 would continue it's wonderfully accessible legacy. This 
was



supposed to soothe our ruffled feathers when 12.10 and 13.04 came out 
with



Unity 3d only which was not as accessible. Well, now, I am curious to 
know



if the timetable for that level of accessibility in a Ubuntu desktop 
will



need to be pushed back even more in light of this development. Please 
see



link below:








Qt 5 contains all the accessibility code that was used for Qt 4, 
including the plugin qt-at-spi which will then no longer be needed. 
Many things have also been improved since we learned from finally making
Qt 4 accessible.

All in all this means that the Qt 5 based Unity should be able to 
reach the level of the old Unity and hopefully exceed it. Of course 
that's still up to the Unity developers and probably a fix here or 
there in Qt, but generally I would expect things to look good.



Greetings

Frederik












http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/03/unity-next-project-announced















Regards,







Alex M









_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org Find out 
how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]