Re: [orca-list] thunderbird getting bad to worst, is evolution a good choice?

[krishnakant Mane <krmane gmail com>]

On 09/04/2012, Jason White <jason jasonjgw net> wrote:
> krishnakant Mane <krmane gmail com> wrote:
> > I have to read and reply a lot of emails every day.
> > I have a lot of attachments that come my way in form of odt and ods files.
> > I need to often attach documents myself.
> > I also need a good serch feature so that I can look at my archives.
> > With my given requirement, is alpine good or mutt?
>
> Either would be fine.
>
> Mutt is better if you like regular expressions: you can search and limit the
> displayed messages via regular expression matching, and there's also now a
> script that enables you to use Notmuch with Mutt. I haven't tried it yet,
> but
> it's on my list of possible enhancements.

Hi jasen,
I think one problem with commandline email clients would be that I
can't have the entire email spoken by Orca?
if yes, then can I also browse the mail body line by line?
Secondly, if I choose alpine, what all search featurs are available?
and finally do I move in the list of emails by up and down arrows?  do
I hear the subjects like I do in thunderbird?
are there shortcuts for sorting the mails by date?
Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.