Re: [orca-list] my thoughts/decisions about orca

[kendell clark <coffeekingms gmail com>]

That'd be great. i myself would like to see websites taht are accessible 
out of the box, instead of this half accessible stuff we have now. Most 
websites seem to work with orca ok, Some lag heavily and some just don't 
work. but oddly enough, some of the websites designed for accessibility 
have issues with orca, Accessible amazon, for instance. IT works, but 
laggy and the text fields aren't labeled.  You get, text. that's all. 
text, or, password. Not, email address, text, or password, just, text. 
On 12/04/2011 07:19 AM, Mallory van Achterberg wrote:
> This is heavily off-topic, but needed to spew this out.
>
> I wish there was a way to get these known, regular, daily frustrations
> out there to web devs. They have absolutely no idea what the difference
> is between real links and fake ones. Or the problems of dressing up
> links as buttons and then thinking putting a role of "button" on
> the link is a good idea (they don't realise spacebar doesn't activate
> it).
>
> The web development community needs this input! Yes, there are bugs in
> browsers, there are bugs in AT like Orca, but web developers are often
> clueless about users, especially users they can't find, see, or get
> feedback from.
>
> We can test for "cross-browser" compliance and we can do analytics to
> see which browsers and OSes people have, whether they run Javascript...
> but we can't see who's using AT. We don't have RBDs. We don't know any
> blind/deaf/limited-in-any-way users. In fact, as web developers we tend
> to know nerds with fat cables (good bandwidth) and ginormous screens and
> the latest technology, not "normal" people with 1024 screens and Windows
> XP and dial-up who use mice to fill in web forms.
>
> Issues stemming not from Orca but from how websites are being built
> show up in this mailing list regularly.
>
> I wish there was a way, esp an easy way, to channel these comments
> of real user experience to some open area where web devs tend to gather
> when looking for information. I wouldn't call it "accessibility" since
> that seems to drive the uninterested away...
> But everyone cares about users and user experience. They especially care
> about conversion. Those terms will get attention.
>
> -Mallory
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:38:33AM -0800, Steve Holmes wrote:
> > I've generally had good luck using Firefox with Orca and manyh web
> > sites.  However, Deedra is right; this flat review thing has really
> > gotta be fixed! Many web sites are going to this garbage of "fake"
> > links where Firefox does not expose them as links to atspi so we
> > cannot click on them with any caret navigation.,  you cannot use caret
> > navigation to click on many links or controls in Dropbox for example.
> >
> > Thanks for filing the bug report, Trev.
> _______________________________________________
> orca-list mailing list
> orca-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
> The manual is at http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
> The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
> Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
> Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp