Re: [orca-list] OpenSolaris (was Re: An Open Letter to Oracle on the Topic Of Accessibility)



On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 00:38 +0000, Michael Whapples wrote:

Also, Joanie, I hadn't realised about the work done with the package 
manager and accessibility, possibly a model of how accessibility in 
applications can be done.

Indeed. It might be a logical interim step between where we are now and
where Will and others are trying to get us. Unless an app is truly
broken, I think it would be easy enough for a 'mainstream' developer
today to test their app with a screen reader and say "yup, it's talking,
and works with the keyboard, must be good" -- all the while failing to
notice an issue simply because they lack a complete understanding of how
users who are blind interact with software.

If each of us were to adopt our favorite piece of software from our
preferred distro/OS and find a way to give timely, practical feedback to
the developers -- ideally before a change was even committed -- I think
we'd prevent quite a few regressions and essentially be providing
further "training" (for lack of a better word) so that the developers
could spot more subtle accessibility and usability issues.

(may be there's a way to get messages written to disk 
and then recovered by booting a working BE, its sometimes just finding 
these features if they exist).

Did you know that you can mount one BE from another and then examine the
typical linuxy log files? (e.g. /var/adm/messages, /var/log/Xorg.0.log,
etc.) I'll email you off-list.

--joanie




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]