On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 23:17 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti > <mpgritti gmail com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> wrote: > > > My feeling is we should keep it simple and display: > > > > > > - all your pinned apps, followed by: > > > - enough other apps to fill up the configured size of the apps stock. > > > Where the other apps come from: > > > - Your top applications (I think it's OK to start doing this as > > > soon as you have top applications at all, sure it won't be that > > > stable for the first couple of days, but that's OK) > > > - Global top apps if you don't have enough top applications or > > > app tracking is not enabled. > > > - Local applications if you aren't logged in > > > > > > [ Is that simple? Well, simpler than what we have now ... ] > > > > This sounds good to me. I'm going to implement this logic unless > > someone disagree. > > See the attached patch. We fallback to local applications only when > anything else fail (global popular apps are available also when logged > out). This patch looks good to commit to me. I think it should make things considerably more understandable. - Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part