Re: [PATCH] Fix static set of initial applications

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<mpgritti gmail com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> wrote:
>  >  My feeling is we should keep it simple and display:
>  >
>  >   - all your pinned apps, followed by:
>  >   - enough other apps to fill up the configured size of the apps stock.
>  >    Where the other apps come from:
>  >    - Your top applications (I think it's OK to start doing this as
>  >      soon as you have top applications at all, sure it won't be that
>  >      stable for the first couple of days, but that's OK)
>  >    - Global top apps if you don't have enough top applications or
>  >      app tracking is not enabled.
>  >    - Local applications if you aren't logged in
>  >
>  >  [ Is that simple? Well, simpler than what we have now ... ]
>  This sounds good to me. I'm going to implement this logic unless
>  someone disagree.

See the attached patch. We fallback to local applications only when
anything else fail (global popular apps are available also when logged


Attachment: apps.patch
Description: Binary data

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]