Re: [gnome-love] Gnome goal proposal : proxy support



On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:58:02PM +0100, Lionel Dricot wrote:
At work, I'm stuck behind a proxy with a password. I then discovered that a
lot of application are not capable of handling a connection with a proxy.
Others require a specific configuration while the proxy configuration is
already available by Gnome. Last but not least, some applications use the
Gnome proxy preferences but forget to handle proxy exceptions or handle
proxy correctly only if no password is required.

'some applications' is a bit vague. Are these part of GNOME, meaning,
listed on http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable ?

The idea of my Gnome Goal proposal would be to have perfect and consistent
proxy support in the whole Gnome desktop, which is a great asset in the
corporate world.

That is not the purpose of a GNOME goal. A goal must be a change which
could be implemented easily across a lot of modules. I don't think
adding proxy support fits with that.

Also, proxy is a bit vague. What does it do, socks or just http?

4) If the proxy requires a password *and* the password is not set in the
gnome-proxy-settings, then ask for it.

We have gnome-keyring for passwords.

5) If the password is already in the gnome proxy settings, don't ask for it
(unlike Epiphany).

File a bug for that.

In order to achieve this, we could make an howto on how to set a local proxy
on your computer and, for a week or two, we will ask all Gnome developpers
to eat their own dog food and only connect through their local proxy. I'm
sure it will reveal a lot of eatches to scratch !

I don't think that'll work. Better to test every application and report
bugs.

Do you believe it worth a Gnome Goal ? Or do you think that individual bug
reports are enough for that. ?

Not exactly sure if it is a 'bug' or more a request for enhancement.
Anyway, bugs aren't solved because they're filed. However, don't think
it is a 'goal' as intended with the GNOME goal wiki site.


There is a proposal for libproxy, but it only handles the configuration,
not the actual proxy. Also saw something on the wiki regarding GProxy.

-- 
Regards,
Olav



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]