On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 09:45 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 02:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:HiShouldn't libnm.pc have Requires: NetworkManager >= 1.0.8Yeah maybe, I dunno. Lubomir?
Ah, got it now... As detailed before, NetworkManager in this case means "NetworkManager.pc" which is part of the legacy libraries. libnm.pc is self-contained and has no requirements on other NetworkManager libraries. Thus it's correct to have no "Requires". Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part