Re: Request for discussion: patch - remove "also request dhcpv6.server-id"
- From: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- To: Thomas Schäfer <tschaefer t-online de>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Request for discussion: patch - remove "also request dhcpv6.server-id"
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:53:38 -0500
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 22:38 +0200, Thomas Schäfer wrote:
Hi,
As already observed in the thread "dhcpv6-problem" some devices are confused
by option request dhcpv6.server-id.
I looked a little bit in to RFC 3736 and 3315. But I still don't know what is
correct.
Do you need the server-id, in case they are more than one servers in your LAN?
Is a empty server-id request a valid request? ( in case of a selection: does
empty mean all or nothing?)
Why doesn't windows send this request?
Because I don't see any disadvantages I propose to remove this request.
At the moment I know three devices which would work with this patch.
ZTE 823D
ZTEMF93E
alcatel one touch W800Z (tct-mobile) alias Telekom Speedsick LTE IV
and I don't know any device which would stop working.
Regards,
Thomas Schäfer
Thanks for tracking this down! I've pushed this to git master, 0.9.10,
and 0.9.8.
Dan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]