Re: [PATCH](or feature-request) build both systemd and ck versions

[Pavel Simerda <psimerda redhat com>]

Hi Luke,

could you please look at the following bug report, subscribe to Cc and comment?

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686997

Thank you in advance,

Pavel

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Luke T. Shumaker" <lukeshu sbcglobal net>
> To: "Pavel Simerda" <psimerda redhat com>
> Cc: "Luke T. Shumaker" <lukeshu sbcglobal net>, networkmanager-list gnome org
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:52:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH](or feature-request) build both systemd and ck versions
> 
> At Thu, 18 Oct 2012 05:19:57 -0400 (EDT),
> Pavel Simerda wrote:
> > In my opinion, you should have just one binary. It is easy to
> > detect systemd
> > at runtime, as it requires cgroups and creates one. Symlink
> > management is
> > an overkill here. CK should be likewise very easy to detect. In
> > absence of
> > both, NetworkManager should still work.
> 
> For the most part, I agree with you.
> 
> I think the best argument against a single binary is that currently
> for systemd support it must be linked against `libsystemd-login`,
> which a non-systemd user might not have.
> 
> But really, that is a "long-term" change, I am advocating producing
> both versions as they currently exist.  What this patch does is the
> same thing as if I built it twice with different configure flags;
> there is no modification to NetworkManager itself, just the build
> system.
> 
> ~ Luke Shumaker
>