Re: [MM] [PATCH] sim: retry SIM operations during initialization

[Aleksander Morgado <aleksander lanedo com>]

> On a related note, since ModemManager already uses AT+CRSM to read
> ICCID and operator name/ID, I wonder if it makes sense to
> "AT+CRSM=176,28423,0,0,9" instead of AT+CIMI for reading IMSI, or use
> it as a fallback solution if AT+CIMI fails or is not supported by a
> modem.
> 
> At least on one modem I have, "AT+CRSM=176,28423,0,0,9" is far more
> reliable than AT+CIMI (which may be an issue in the modem firmware).
> 

We can provide one as default and the other one as fallback if the first
one doesn't reply a proper value. This can be done directly in the
generic MMBroadbandModem.

-- 
Aleksander