Re: dhcdbd licensing

On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:16 -0400, Jason Vas Dias wrote:
> > Best to have *some* license on it, rather than just "distributable".
> Why ?

It removes any question as to what license the code is under.  Ambiguity
is bad.

> > The choice in the end is up to the copyright holder. Jason?
> > 
> I'll put the string "GPL" in the .spec file in the next release -
> it makes no difference to me.

If you GPL the code, you'll need a copy of the GPL along with the
soruce, and most likely a standard GPL copyright header at the top of
your files (both header and source).


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]