Re: dhcdbd licensing
- From: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- To: jvdias redhat com
- Cc: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>, networkmanager-list gnome org, Tom Parker <palfrey gmail com>
- Subject: Re: dhcdbd licensing
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:59:54 -0400
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:16 -0400, Jason Vas Dias wrote:
> > Best to have *some* license on it, rather than just "distributable".
> Why ?
It removes any question as to what license the code is under. Ambiguity
is bad.
> > The choice in the end is up to the copyright holder. Jason?
> >
> I'll put the string "GPL" in the .spec file in the next release -
> it makes no difference to me.
If you GPL the code, you'll need a copy of the GPL along with the
soruce, and most likely a standard GPL copyright header at the top of
your files (both header and source).
Dan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
