Re: dhcdbd licensing

[Jason Vas Dias <jvdias redhat com>]

On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 06:18, Tom Parker wrote:
> On 19 May 2005 18:21:44 -0400, Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com> wrote:
> > though putting this particular project under the GNU GPL makes a lot
> > more sense to me.
> 
> Given also the existing licensing of NetworkManager under the GPL, and
> that some people (myself included) may well partially decide their
> level of contribution to a project based on its license, I would
> prefer if it became GPLed. Admittedly, I can't see a commercial
> company seeing any point in making a forked proprietary version of a
> DBUS DHCP program, but you never know...
> 
What would be the problem with that ?

> Best to have *some* license on it, rather than just "distributable".
Why ?

> The choice in the end is up to the copyright holder. Jason?
> 
I'll put the string "GPL" in the .spec file in the next release -
it makes no difference to me.

Regards,
Jason Vas Dias.