Re: [PATCH 0/9] Port to latest GTK+ 2 and gtkmm-2.4
- From: Dodji Seketeli <dodji seketeli org>
- To: The mailing list of the Nemiver project <nemiver-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Port to latest GTK+ 2 and gtkmm-2.4
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:20:53 +0200
Kalev Lember <kalevlember gmail com> a écrit:
> Ghex doesn't seem to currently have a maintainer, so that might take a
> while, unless we do it ourselves.
Indeed. Sigh. I would delay the Ghex part as much as possible, to give
a chance to someone to opt-in and share the fame :-) Maybe we could talk
more publicly about the need of porting Ghex to gtk3 at some point.
> I do think that we should strive to keep the differences between master
> and gtk3 branches minimal to make future merging easier.
Agreed.
> What versions of libraries should the gtk3-free master branch target?
Good question.
> Should we target the latest gtk2 / gtkmm-2.4, or perhaps the versions
> that are in Debian stable, or something in between (Fedora 14, Ubuntu
> 10.10)?
I think targeting Debian stable does make a lot of sense, as long it
doesn't cause us too much hassle. I would put Fedora/EPEL6 in the same
bag, for selfish reasons as I maintain the Nemiver package in
Fedora/EPEL6. So that would mean us targeting gtk2 version 2.18 and
gtkmm2' version 2.18.
Are these too old?
--
Dodji
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]