Re: [PATCH 0/9] Port to latest GTK+ 2 and gtkmm-2.4



Kalev Lember <kalevlember gmail com> a écrit:

> Ghex doesn't seem to currently have a maintainer, so that might take a
> while, unless we do it ourselves.

Indeed.  Sigh.  I would delay the Ghex part as much as possible, to give
a chance to someone to opt-in and share the fame :-) Maybe we could talk
more publicly about the need of porting Ghex to gtk3 at some point.

> I do think that we should strive to keep the differences between master
> and gtk3 branches minimal to make future merging easier.

Agreed.

> What versions of libraries should the gtk3-free master branch target?

Good question.

> Should we target the latest gtk2 / gtkmm-2.4, or perhaps the versions
> that are in Debian stable, or something in between (Fedora 14, Ubuntu
> 10.10)?

I think targeting Debian stable does make a lot of sense, as long it
doesn't cause us too much hassle.  I would put Fedora/EPEL6 in the same
bag, for selfish reasons as I maintain the Nemiver package in
Fedora/EPEL6.  So that would mean us targeting gtk2 version 2.18 and
gtkmm2' version 2.18.

Are these too old?

-- 
		Dodji


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]