Re: Progress on nautilus-python bindings for Nautilus 3.0 (gobject introspection)

[Adam Plumb <adamplumb gmail com>]

Quick update to this, I figured out why this is happening.  It's
because I was passing the OperationHandle type object to the method
and not the actual handle.

Adam

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Adam Plumb <adamplumb gmail com> wrote:
> I'm having an issue with the InfoProvider methods.  The
> update_file_info function passes several parameters to the extensions,
> that they need to keep track of in order to be used asynchronously.
> One is the NautilusOperationHandle struct and the other is the
> update_complete closure.  I'll talk first about the handle.
>
> For the NautilusOperationHandle, I'm importing the
> Nautilus.OperationHandle attribute from the gi.repository.Nautilus
> module and assigning it to the PyObject, which I then convert all
> incoming handles to from their C counterparts.  The problem is that
> when the python extension tries to pass the handle to the
> Nautilus.info_provider_update_complete_invoke function, I get the
> following error:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "/home/aplumb/.local/share/nautilus-python/extensions/update-file-info-async.py",
> line 17, in update_cb
>    Nautilus.info_provider_update_complete_invoke(self.hello,
> provider, handle, Nautilus.OperationResult.FAILED)
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gi/types.py", line
> 40, in function
>    return info.invoke(*args)
> TypeError: argument 2: Must be Nautilus.OperationHandle, not StructMeta
>
> I'm having a problem with the closure stuff too but I figured I would
> start with this.
>
> Adam
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Cosimo Cecchi <cosimoc gnome org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 16:23 -0500, Adam Plumb wrote:
>>> I finally made some progress getting the nautilus-python bindings
>>> updated to work with gobject introspection and without pygtk.  They
>>> take advantage of the fact that Nautilus publishes its annotations in
>>> the gi repository.  That has the great benefit of allowing
>>> nautilus-python to finally shed it's defs and overrides files, and to
>>> remove its dependency on pygtk.
>>
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> this is good news! Please file bugs if you find missing annotations in
>> libnautilus-extension.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Cosimo
>>
>>
>