Re: templates patch ...
- From: Michael Meeks <michael meeks novell com>
- To: Christian Neumair <cneumair gnome org>
- Cc: Federico Mena Quintero <federico novell com>, nautilus-list <nautilus-list gnome org>, David Zeuthen <david fubar dk>
- Subject: Re: templates patch ...
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:24:19 +0100
Hi there,
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 23:37 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> However, after reading the extensive comprehensible argumentation by
> Alex, David and Kristoffer, and after actually playing around with
> Konqueror and Dolphin, I must say that now I am against such a proposal.
:-)
> The coding complexity for merging all the menus in a proper way is just
> not worth the effort.
So - lets split them; put the 'system' ones below any the user happens
to have configured [ to save muscle memory ], and add a nice toggle
button to the menu to let them easily disable the system templates from
showing up (?).
> Also, the template system of KDE does not seem to integrate in a nice
> way: They don't even use OnlyShowIn
Easy enough to ask them to fix; and more their problem than ours.
> and have weird non-standard URL references like
>
> URL=.source/DVDROM-Device.desktop
That is a relative URL from the current directory; ls -a will show you
the .source directory. More concerning to me would be the nastiness (in
general) of "device" .desktop files - but adding some OnlyShowIn
goodness would hide them from nautilus users at least.
> Besides, the UI of Dolphin and Konqueror randomly adds separators and
> submenus to the UI which also do not seem to be specified anywhere in
> the source template files.
Sounds broken :-) we don't have to do that.
> I love how everybody cares about the users, but for this use-case
> skeletons and symlinks are definitely enough.
So - really; do any distros actually configure a skeleton with nautilus
templates included ? how are they implemented ? with symlinks ? if so,
how does it feel never being able to move the destination files
again ? ;-) or is it the case that we ship something not that usable out
of the box on ~all distros ? :-)
> Sorry for all the noise and for the slalom - nobody is perfect :).
Keep slalom'ing ;-) I'd like to propose two things: adding a check-box
to turn that thing off - either in the menu, or in some settings place
for the power-users who stuffed that menu full of their own templates
already. Adding system templates at the bottom - after a separator, and
implementing some more .desktop file magic to create "template apps" -
which can be passed a path [ to the relevant directory ] and present a
pretty UI for creating a template right there.
How does that sound ?
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael meeks novell com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]