Re: gtkhtml2 view
- From: Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: dave bordoley <bordoley msu edu>
- Cc: nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gtkhtml2 view
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 10:19:43 -0400 (EDT)
On 14 May 2002, dave bordoley wrote:
> Now that nautilus will no longer support viewing of html in nautilus and
> is going to instead just launch a web browser if the user enters a web
> address, maybe we should just not ship the gtkhtml2 view, since it's
> pretty buggy and unmaintained. Also would allow us to close some bugs.
>
> Alternatively, if gtkhtml2 view is still shipped can we move it's bugs
> to the gtkhtml component in bugzilla. Perhaps someone interested in
> fixing gtkhtml will look at them there.
>
> If i'm way off base here please let me know.
a) We're not shipping the gtkhtml2 view
b) Sometime we're gonna get a html view, gtkhtml1 or mozilla based. So we
don't want to just forcefully close all html view bugs.
If the bug is in the HTML renderer, then the correct thing to do is to
assign it to the right bugzilla component (gtkhtml2 bugzilla is at
http://bugzilla.codefactory.se/, gtkhtml1 is in gnome bugzilla, mozilla
is at bugzilla.mozilla.org).
If the bug is in the view then it may be in all the html views, and the
bug rightly belongs in nautilus-mozilla or nautilus-gtkhtml, if those
components exist in bugzilla. Otherwise I guess we should keep them in
the nautilus view as webpage component.
Of course, if the bug report is totally crappy and/or has no interesting
information we should close it. Or if it stuff that clearly relates to
"old" stuff, like build problems.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
He's an underprivileged devious cop on the run. She's a psychotic blonde
mercenary with a birthmark shaped like Liberty's torch. They fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]