On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 14:49, Seth Nickell wrote: > On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 09:29, Jon Allen wrote: > > On 6 Feb 2002, Glen Gray wrote: > > > > > That list looked great. There is some overlap with files there. The main > > > thing that caught my attention was the Themes. Themes.org have got > > > support for Nautilus (though there aren't many there last I checked.). > > > So perhaps some info on how to create themes and then a pointer to > > > themes.org web-site. > > > > > > > Thanks for mentioning that. I haven't been around to themes.org > > recently, I didn't realize we had themes for nautilus there. A theme > > creation doc and pointer to themes.org should suffice. The offerings there > > are pretty slim, we need to get more up [hint to anyone out there with > > n. themes]. > > If you're willing to put in the work I would encourage you to have a > themes section in-spite of themes.org. Themes.org has: > > a) a convoluted interface > b) goes down a lot for extended periods > c) collects any and all submissions > > I think having a reliable site that actually filtered themes a little > would be of great value to many people. Actually, I've briefly discussed > the idea of doing this for all GNOME-related themes. > I agree - then it would be conceivable to have something like metatheme grab themes from gnome.org or something as well, if we have some control over what themes are there and how they are packaged. > -Seth > > > _______________________________________________ > nautilus-list mailing list > nautilus-list lists eazel com > http://lists.eazel.com/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part