Re: [Galeon-devel] Re: [Nautilus-list] Nautilus-Mozilla proposal

[Dave Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>]

On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 04:56, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 00:59, Dave Bordoley wrote:
> > On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 17:31, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > > > parts ie. galeon could be optionally built with or without nautilus
> > > > support.
> > > 
> > > That actually is essential IMHO. I know a lot of people who use galeon
> > > without gnome, as well as many people using gnome without nautilus.
> > > (me for example, i rarely run nautilus, i prefer xterms ;)
> > > Actually the Debian Packages are currently built without nautilus
> > > support; a few people have complained to me about galeon requiring
> > > libnautilus, so i decided to remove the nautilus support for now.
> > > IMHO it would be very good if the nautilus view could be build
> > > completely separate.
> > 
> > Another cool thing would be if you could install the galeon view for
> > nautilus without installing the complete galeon shell. Would be a nice
> > option.
> 
> This is probably going to require nautilus to be fixed to deal correctly
> with mozilla javascript popups. The current view just use galeon to show
> them.
> This has been already discussed but I dont think it has been
> implemented:
> http://lists.eazel.com/pipermail/nautilus-list/2001-October/005994.html
> 
> Marco

ehh javascript popups are annoying, who needs them anyway. :)

dave

just kiddin.