Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: when that call to nautilus_directory_force_reload is not needed

On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, David Emory Watson wrote:

> On 14 Jun 2001 08:40:58 -0700, Darin Adler wrote:
> > I'd prefer to just make the FAM change though, and not waste time
> > optimizing things for the non-FAM case. Nautilus already works way better
> > with FAM, and I think we should change it to a hard requirement rather
> > than an optional one for some future version. Note that it's not good to
> > require the kernel mod IMON, but requiring FAM is probably fine.
> I agree 100%.
> If FAM were to become a requirement, would there be any problems with
> removing the Reload button?

Yes. FAM doesn't support SMB, or ftp, or http....

/ Alex

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]