RE: [Nautilus-list] Re: when that call to nautilus_directory_force_reload is not needed

["Ryan Muldoon" <rpmuldoon students wisc edu>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nautilus-list-admin lists eazel com
> [mailto:nautilus-list-admin lists eazel com]On Behalf Of David Emory
> Watson
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 10:51 AM
> To: Darin Adler
> Cc: Yoann Vandoorselaere; Zbigniew Chyla; nautilus-list lists eazel com
> Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: when that call to
> nautilus_directory_force_reload is not needed
>
>
> On 14 Jun 2001 08:40:58 -0700, Darin Adler wrote:
> > I'd prefer to just make the FAM change though, and not waste time
> > optimizing things for the non-FAM case. Nautilus already works
> way better
> > with FAM, and I think we should change it to a hard requirement rather
> > than an optional one for some future version. Note that it's
> not good to
> > require the kernel mod IMON, but requiring FAM is probably fine.
>
> I agree 100%.
>
> If FAM were to become a requirement, would there be any problems with
> removing the Reload button?
>
Some components would still need it, like the web browser.  Unless gnome_vfs
made a generalized api to handle that or something.  I guess bonobo menu
merging could add/subtract the refresh button as needed though