Re: [Nautilus-list] Make fam a real dependency

> My original fear was that Nautilus with FAM would not show up at all if we 
> required that packagers create suitable FAM packages, but in retrospect I 
> guess it's silly. Does anyone know what Ximian and Red Hat would do about 
> this? Would either of them make a Nautilus package that includes the FAM 
> support, or would FAM support become a "cvs-only" feature if we make this 
> change?

We would do it for distributions that support it. Since Havoc and Alex
say they'll do it for Red Hat, our RH packages would probably support
it, yeah.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]