Re: [Nautilus-list] Make fam a real dependency

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 01:35:34PM -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
> > My original fear was that Nautilus with FAM would not show up at all if we 
> > required that packagers create suitable FAM packages, but in retrospect I 
> > guess it's silly. Does anyone know what Ximian and Red Hat would do about 
> > this? Would either of them make a Nautilus package that includes the FAM 
> > support, or would FAM support become a "cvs-only" feature if we make this 
> > change?
> We would do it for distributions that support it. Since Havoc and Alex
> say they'll do it for Red Hat, our RH packages would probably support
> it, yeah.

You're not going to ship: kernel-image-2.4.5_2.4.5-ximian1_i386.deb?



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]