Re: [Nautilus-list] Integration of gmc and nautilus desktop directories.

[Ben Ford <ben kalifornia com>]

Ian McKellar wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 03:23:35PM -0700, Seth Nickell wrote:
>
> > > and what about making nautilus run on non-perfectly posix
> > > platforms?  shooting yourself in the foot at this stage (before it gets
> > > entrenched as a 'normal' place to store the desktop data) is kinda silly.
> > Asking the system to provide POSIX conformance is a very reasonable
> > request. If people would like to port Nautilus to non-POSIX systems,
> > they are welcome to, but dealing with such fringe contingencies seems a
> > waste of developer time (unless it happens to scratch your particular
> > itch).
>
> I mean, name a platform that *isn't* POSIX compliant!
Linux.  (but it's close)

--
Three things are certain:
Death, taxes, and lost data
Guess which has occurred.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Patched Micro$oft servers are secure today . . . but tomorrow is another story!