Re: [Nautilus-list] POSIXly Nautilus (was Re: Integration of gmc and nautilus desktop directories)

[Evandro Fernandes Giovanini <evandro cmgiovan terra com br>]

Em Sexta 13 Abril 2001 20:29, you wrote:
> Em 13 Apr 2001 16:22:59 -0700, Ian McKellar escreveu:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:15:24PM -0300, Cesar Cardoso wrote:
> > > Em 13 Apr 2001 15:56:43 -0700, Ian McKellar escreveu:
> > > > > > I mean, name a platform that *isn't* POSIX compliant!
> > > > >
> > > > > I can only remember Windows 9x/ME.
> > > >
> > > > But Win2k has a POSIX layer (afaik), and MS is phasing out the old
> > > > DOS based platforms.
> > >
> > > NT was certified as POSIX compliant, AFAIK. Way before 2K :-)
> >
> > A friend of mine likes to point out that the first two operating systems
> > to be certified POSIX compliant weren't UNIXes, but VMS and some IBM
> > mainframe OS ;-)
>
> Hm.
> So, if all OS in the market are POSIX-compliant, and Nautilus can be
> ported to any POSIX-compliant system...
> ...someone can port Nautilus to MacOS X or Windows XP, right? ;-)

anyone can port nautilus to any OS, nautilus is free software.

--
Evandro