[Nautilus-list] POSIXly Nautilus (was Re: Integration of gmc and nautilus desktop directories)



Em 13 Apr 2001 16:22:59 -0700, Ian McKellar escreveu:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:15:24PM -0300, Cesar Cardoso wrote:
> > Em 13 Apr 2001 15:56:43 -0700, Ian McKellar escreveu:
> > 
> > > > > I mean, name a platform that *isn't* POSIX compliant!
> > > > > 
> > > > I can only remember Windows 9x/ME.
> > > 
> > > But Win2k has a POSIX layer (afaik), and MS is phasing out the old DOS based
> > > platforms.
> > >
> > NT was certified as POSIX compliant, AFAIK. Way before 2K :-)
> 
> A friend of mine likes to point out that the first two operating systems to
> be certified POSIX compliant weren't UNIXes, but VMS and some IBM mainframe
> OS ;-)
 
Hm.
So, if all OS in the market are POSIX-compliant, and Nautilus can be
ported to any POSIX-compliant system...
...someone can port Nautilus to MacOS X or Windows XP, right? ;-)

-- 
---
Cesar Cardoso - cesarcardoso ig com br - ICQ 32237133
"MOVE 'ZIG'!!! FOR GREAT JUSTICE!" 






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]