Re: [Nautilus-list] [Feedback Request] Tutorial --- How to Verify Nautilus Bugs
- From: Darin Adler <darin eazel com>
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>, <eli eazel com>
- Cc: <nautilus-list lists eazel com>, <victor eazel com>, <linuxfan ionet net>
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] [Feedback Request] Tutorial --- How to Verify Nautilus Bugs
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 14:38:31 -0700
on 9/9/00 6:13 PM, Maciej Stachowiak at mjs eazel com wrote:
> WORKSFORME should be verified in my opinion - it's sort of the same as
> FIXED only you're claiming it was never broken as far as you know.
Not sure on this one, but I do like the idea of someone looking it over.
> DUPLICATE likely does not need verification.
I think it does. I want someone to double-check that it's really a duplicate
> And I'm not sure about INVALID because I don't know what that state is
> supposed to mean.
INVALID means that there's something wrong with the bug report, rather than
with the software. Once again, I'd like to have someone double-check it, so
verifying seems good.
-- Darin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]