Re: [Nautilus-list] [Feedback Request] Tutorial --- How to Verify Nautilus Bugs

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>]

Darin Adler <darin eazel com> writes:

> on 9/9/00 6:13 PM, Maciej Stachowiak at mjs eazel com wrote:
> 
> > WORKSFORME should be verified in my opinion - it's sort of the same as
> > FIXED only you're claiming it was never broken as far as you know.
> 
> Not sure on this one, but I do like the idea of someone looking it over.
> 

In an ideal world the original reported would verify it as fixed for
him or her too.

> > DUPLICATE likely does not need verification.
> 
> I think it does. I want someone to double-check that it's really a duplicate
>

I'll buy that, but do we think volunteers of the net can usefully make
this determination in most cases?
 
> > And I'm not sure about INVALID because I don't know what that state is
> > supposed to mean.
> 
> INVALID means that there's something wrong with the bug report, rather than
> with the software. Once again, I'd like to have someone double-check it, so
> verifying seems good.
> 

Ditto.

 - Maciej