Re: [Nautilus-list] Nautilus on potato requires libw3c: is this the same as Debian's?
- From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- To: Stefan Rieken <StefanRieken SoftHome net>, nautilus-list lists eazel com
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Nautilus on potato requires libw3c: is this the same as Debian's?
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 08:57:40 -0800
I suspect these are the same libraries, but they were probably renamed
in woody as people were probably expecting a new series of libwww's. In
the woody tree libwww0 is the default name. You can probably just use
the ones from potato, unless they cause dependency problems.
-Seth
Stefan Rieken wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> First, I want to congratulate you with PR2. I haven't downloaded it yet,
> but eagerly awaited it :-)
>
> Now, at http://www.eazel.com/download/build_instructions , it is stated:
>
> "Note for Debian Potato users:you will need libwww, which you can
> find"...
>
> followed by URLs for the following packages:
>
> libw3c-libwww5_5.2.8-1.i386.deb
> libw3c-libwww-dev_5.2.8-1_i386.deb
>
> Debian Potato contains the following packages:
>
> libw3c-libwww0_5.2.8-1.i386.deb
> libw3c-libwww-dev_5.2.8-1_i386.deb
>
> Notice that the only difference is the "0" instead of the "5". Can
> someone explain:
> - if this are the same packages
> - why the name is different but not the version
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stefan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nautilus-list mailing list
> Nautilus-list lists eazel com
> http://lists.eazel.com/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]