Agreed, he's friendly and helpful, his code is good, and I believe he's going to stick around and continue to contribute good things to GNOME. I vouch for Richard. Philip On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 13:16 +0200, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
I've been observing the work of Richard as part of the summer of code administration. Philip is more up to date on this but it looks like he is doing a stunning job. On a personal level, I've had the chance to spend quite a lot of time with him during the summit and he definitely has the heart on the right place with regards to GNOME. I don't see any reason why we should not approve this request. I'm sure we'll hear plenty more good things about him in the future. On 09 Aug 2011, at 12:33, "Pedro Villavicencio via RT" <membership-applications gnome org> wrote:Dear Ruben Vermeersch and Philip Withnall, The GNOME Membership Committee is about to process Richard Schwarting's application to become a GNOME Foundation Member and therefore we would like to receive some feedback about the applicant and the GNOME-related work. (past and present contributions are usually fine) Please remember that vouching for a contributor means you really think he/she deserves to be a Foundation Member and that you trust the applicant and their work for the global GNOME community. If unsure about vouching or not, please let us know why you don't feel enough comfortable in advocating this applicant. For further details about the applicant, feel free to have a look at the applicant's application at the following link: <link to applicant's mail on our archives> (http://mail.gnome.org/archives/membership-committee/) At your service, The GNOME Foundation Membership Committee ---------------------------------------------------- This message was sent via GNOME.org Request Tracker.
---------------------------------------------------- This message was sent via GNOME.org Request Tracker.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature