Re: Draft candidacy announcement (Disclamer: No official value)

[Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>]

On lun, 2005-11-21 at 18:06 +0200, Baris Cicek wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 07:32 -0800, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> > I could still be convinced that changing the dates is a bad idea,
> > though.
> Is there any other comment about this? Other committee members agree
> with us on keeping current schedule?

Just one thing: if you change the schedule, make sure to announce it
with the list of candidates. It sounds weird to change the schedule
after that (except if there's a technical problem).

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressÃs.