Re: Addressing MC stagnation.

Hi Pavel,

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 03:20, Pavel Roskin wrote:
I would suggest if such a step would be made we use the MC_4_6_1_PRE for
this. HEAD is somewhat experimental.

I disagree.  We would confuse everybody.  The 4.6.1 branch should be
released as 4.6.1 if at all (maybe as 4.6.2 if there we unofficial 4.6.1

It's the experimental code that should become 5.0 or 4.7 or whatever we
choose.  If it's too unstable, we could make some prereleases.

?? Aren't you saying what I'm saying? MC_4_6_1_PRE should become
mc-4.6.1 and HEAD should be used for the release of 4.7 (the viewer code
is not well tested so I believe it shouldn't be used for 4.6.1). Where
do we disagree?


mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]