Re: [PATCH] do not abort on broken .cpio file
- From: Slava Zanko <slavazanko gmail com>
- To: mc-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] do not abort on broken .cpio file
- Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:19:03 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
02.11.2009 05:32, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Denys Vlasenko <vda linux googlemail com> schrieb:
>
>> For example, you can have a rule that committer is responsible for that.
>>
>> If you have a few people in your team whom you trust
>> that they are organized enough to always do a compile test
>> and a basic run test before committing, then they may
>> be entrusted in "fast-forwarding" trivial stuff.
>
> Right, we sometimes have things that are trivial enough, eg. #1692.
I think, better way: agregate all these tickets into one simmary, like:
http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/1674
Enrico, I think, for all 'Remove obsolete checks ...' stuff need to
create summary ticket too. This will so easy to review and vote.
> *If* we have really blocking things, there will be discussions
> here, triggering faster reviews, IMHO.
Yes, right. But no need to create ticket for any 'code cleanup'-like
think ;)
WBR, Slavaz.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkrvPrcACgkQb3oGR6aVLpob0QCeK+jW0GJUO2S8bLPbbsOoM7bn
5k0An2ELRYIrx0kiJvmsWABXEIq+ay7Y
=xgIp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]