Re: Further Midnight Commander development

[Slava Zanko <slavazanko gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> Well,
> 
> As I see there are plenty of people who would like to work further on mc, it 
> would be very sad if these people will work on different versions, as this is 
> ineffective, and tend to end in even more dead projects. 

Yes, this may be a trouble. We have already realized it and in the
future will try to communicate in English.

> My suggestion would be to have at first a look who wants to help to develop mc 
> further and then where to do this. 
> Personally I would like to make a viewable break to the development which was 
> done until now, this mean: a new repository (not longer the CVS (as CVS is 
> ancient in my eyes and svn or git is much better). 

In now, we use svn (what we well known), but I like the distributed
VCS's more. If there an easy migration way from svn to git then this
opportunity will be considered. And with the wishes of the people who
are interested in further development of the project - a decision would
not been taken only of a developers team.

> So: At first the people who would like to work on mc should send a: "I would 
> like to do something".

Yes, we like. We would like further improvement and development of
Midnight Commander.


WBR, Slavaz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJSkcub3oGR6aVLpoRAgsNAJ0a5VjMnUErK53fxBcXGUiy6H9w4gCfb2fI
2xecvDgmguii94gbjCul5qs=
=UwkU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----