Re: cons.saver limit on the maximum number of lines/columns



Hello,

On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:

> Hello Pavel,
>
> On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 20:06, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> > > Indeed this limit should be increased to 512, but as I've pointed out
> > > before that is sadly not a one place fix.
> >
> > Are you sure ?
>
> The limit should be set according to the slang version, not to a fixed
> 512. We should probably set MAXCOLS with an appropriate value instead of
> hard coding it as is currently the case.
>
> So yes, I am not sure about every detail at this point, but I am about
> the fact that this requires a bit more than just changing one value in a
> single place.

Where have you been when the changes to slang_init() were discussed ?
Suddenly, such a big discussion over a not so big thing ?



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]