Re: Getting GNOME page on gnome.org
- From: Akshay Vyas <akshayvyas29 gmail com>
- To: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- Cc: marketing-list <marketing-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Getting GNOME page on gnome.org
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 02:42:56 +0530
Hi
Andre Klapper
Linux mint is using MGSE ie the gnome-extensions created by them on gnome3
i dont think ur wrong here they configured(modified) linux mint with
some extensions
to make it more user friendly
here's the link http://www.linuxmint.com/rel_lisa_whatsnew.php
and about ubuntu i dont think they are using GNOME on their default
distribution
according to distrowatch its unity for ubuntu and GNOME for linux mint
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=ubuntu
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=mint
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:
> Hi Akshay,
>
> On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 01:45 +0530, Akshay Vyas wrote:
>> Missed linux mint,Linux mint also has GNOME3 in their main/base
>> distribution and as
>> far as i know it is most popular amongst the linux newbies
>
> I must admit that I don't know much about recent Linux Mint developments
> and decisions. I'd see the same problem as with Ubuntu (see below: "By
> default Ubuntu comes with something that is very different from what we
> advertise on our websites") but I am happy to be proven wrong. :)
> So in case that you know: Does Linux Mint 12 by default use gnome-shell,
> or does it use MGSE, or other shells such as Mate (or Cinnamon in
> version 13) by default?
> I've been quickly reading through http://blog.linuxmint.com/ but could
> not find anything that makes it much clearer either to me.
>
> andre
>
>> 2012/4/1 Juanjo Marín <juanjomarin96 yahoo es>:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Mensaje original -----
>> >> De: Andreas Nilsson <andreas andreasn se>
>> >> Para: marketing-list <marketing-list gnome org>
>> >> CC:
>> >> Enviado: Sábado 31 de marzo de 2012 15:40
>> >> Asunto: Getting GNOME page on gnome.org
>> >>
>> >> Hi!
>> >> Shortly before the 3.4 release the web team made some adjustments to the page
>> >> http://www.gnome.org/getting-gnome/
>> >> This made the links for Arch Linux, Mageia and Debian smaller. I feel some
>> >> explaining of the rationale behind this is in order so that we don't end up
>> >> with the same thing again within the next 6 months.
>> >>
>> >> We made this change so it would be more straight to get GNOME for the largest
>> >> share of website visitors possible. Taking aside the fact that it's a fairly
>> >> complicated business to get yourself a working GNOME 3 system compared to say,
>> >> installing Firefox or LibreOffice, I felt these three systems are fair
>> >> compromises (they are also ordered alphabetically):
>> >> * Fedora - best in class, big download link straight off their website and a
>> >> system that is very close to a vanilla GNOME 3 system (+ some software I am
>> >> somewhat unhappy about like SELinux, ABRT but that's ok).
>> >> * OpenSUSE - Some jumping through hoops in order to get what you're actually
>> >> looking for and a certain risk of ending up with KDE or some other system in the
>> >> end. I've talked to Jos and the current link is the best we can do today.
>> >> [1]
>> >> * Ubuntu - By default Ubuntu comes with something that is very different from
>> >> what we advertise on our websites, but questions about how to install latest
>> >> GNOME 3 on Ubuntu keeps coming up a lot on our G+, Facebook and news articles,
>> >> so hopefully the apt:-link will do all right.
>> >>
>> >> So what about the others then? I forgot about the Amazing Distro X! :)
>> >> I felt that the instructions for Arch ("GNOME is available in the _extra_
>> >> repository"), Mageia ("GNOME 3 is coming in the next version")
>> >> and Debian ("In experimental, not in stable at all"). All these
>> >> distros are probably really cool, but they are making things harder for our
>> >> users. But! I am hopeful that their website front pages will do their best to
>> >> advertise how to get a working GNOME 3 system up and running in very little time
>> >> in the future.
>> >>
>> >
>> > For me it's ok, though IMHO I've found the font size too small and difficult to read, at
>> > least for me. I think that showing the links of these distros in a single line is enough to
>> > note that your state above.
>> >
>> > Just my two cents,
>> >
>> > -- Juanjo Marin
>> > --
>> > marketing-list mailing list
>> > marketing-list gnome org
>> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Akshay vyas
>
> --
> mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
>
--
Akshay vyas
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]