On Wed, July 18, 2012 7:47 am, Allan Day wrote:
> Emily Gonyer <
emilyyrose gmail com> wrote:
>> I think we should aim for a minimum of 2 posts a week, and if/when
>> there is more to post, not hesitate to do so. Whenever big events (ie
>> GUADEC, GNOME.Asia, etc) occur, its quite likely that we'll have much
>> more content to publish, and limiting ourselves to 3 or so posts a
>> week just seems silly. It also sets ourselves up for irrelevance as we
>> are likely to have time-relative material that only makes sense to
>> publish around the event. Waiting untill afterwards simply because of
>> a pre-determined schedule is likely to make it fall into irrelevance
>> and not get published at all. During GUADEC large portions of our
>> audience are likely to want releveant and up-to-date posts more so
>> than at other times.
>
> To clarify - the suggestion for 3 posts a week was a minimum, not a
> maximum, and the number was just intended to get the discussion going.
> We can totally change that. :)
>
> I would hope that we will include event reports within the schedule,
> and we will obviously need to be flexible in order to cover events as
> the happen. That'll take a little bit of running coordination.
>
> The main goal of the schedule (and the editorial team) is to ensure
> that posts are fairly evenly spaced. We don't want too many posts at
> the same time, and we need to avoid having lengthy dry periods.
