Re: Fwd: wgo revamp showstoppers



Hi Quim!

Quim Gil wrote:
On 3/7/07, Andreas Nilsson <nisses mail home se> wrote:
Do we need graphics for all the pages, or are some more critical than
others?

Critical-critical there is nothing critical if we consider that the
main reference now is to improve the current wgo - which is really dry
on graphics.

(snip)

- The Logo & trademarks page needs a GNOME logo, obviously.  :)
Can we more or less cut&paste this?
http://live.gnome.org/BrandGuidelines

http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/RevampShowstoppers updated, I have put
"Important" in the pages where graphics are... important.
http://gnome.jardigrec.eu/en/get-started - done

http://andreasn.se/diverse/temp/king-size/package-128.png
http://andreasn.se/diverse/temp/king-size/package-256.png
http://andreasn.se/diverse/temp/king-size/package.svg

More stuff will follow. Thanks for the pointers!
- Andreas



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]