Re: LC_ALL
- From: Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh farsiweb info>
- To: Bruno Haible <bruno clisp org>
- Cc: GNOME Locale mailing list <locale-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: LC_ALL
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:49:03 +0430
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 13:59 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> I don't agree on this. glibc and CLDR provide different data for the same
> things. A setting of LC_ALL=fa_IR should switch all CLDR data to Persian,
> not only the part for which glibc has APIs.
>
> The difference regarding the locale name is only a minor point. We can
> build a 1-1 mapping between those naming conventions, and anyway, the
> vast majority of users have a locale named ll_CC, which is valid in
> both ways.
You seem to be right.
But something we can't map easily, is the part after the "@". These are
low-level customizations, as opposed to higher level customization which
a user may have. These are not like a fixed set like a few alternate
selectors really, but are dynamic. These are not like the LC_* things
that map to another locale either.
Perhaps we should have an environment variable for these, or one for
each. Perhaps one could set LOCALE to
"collation=phonebook,currency=DDM"?
roozbeh
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]