Re: xsd validation in libxml++

[Kjell Ahlstedt <kjell ahlstedt bredband net>]

xmlSchemaSAXPlug() is not wrapped in libxml++. If you like, you can file 
a bug report in Bugzilla, suggesting that it shall be wrapped.
If you attach a patch with the necessary changes and an example program, 
it will almost certainly be implemented. If you supply less detailed 
instructions of what you want, it may still be implemented.

Kjell

2013-08-19 08:39, tremmel gtec at skrev:
> Hey again,
>
> I sadly need to use a SAX parser instead of DOM and can't use the example
> posted here. I looked up and it should work with the function
> xmlSchemaSAXPlug anyone has an example for that ?
>
> Regards, Christoph
>
> > Hey Kjell,
> >
> > I think that should do it. Thank you very much.
> >
> > Christoph
> >
> > > Hi Christoph,
> > >
> > > Is this what you need?
> > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/libxml++/tree/examples/schemavalidation
> > >
> > > There are probably parts of libxml2 that have not been wrapped in C++
> > > code in libxml++. If you miss something in libxml++, you can file a
> > > bug in Bugzilla. If you also attach a patch, there is a high
> > > probability that it will be implemented.
> > >
> > > Kjell
> > >
> > > 2013-08-09 09:46, Hugo van den Brand skrev:
> > > > Dear Christoph,
> > > >
> > > > Your question made me think of a code that I wrote in C++ using an
> > > > xmlschema.
> > > > I also did find a validation for a schema file in libxml++.
> > > > I countered this by using libxml2 (the C implementation) to check the
> > > > xmlschema.
> > > > I wrote one function containing only libxml2 C commands.
> > > > After checking I just closed the file and reopened it with the
> > > > DomParser in C++ code.
> > > > This makeshift solution worked for me and I could provide my function
> > > > if you need it.
> > > >
> > > > That of course raises the question whether xsd schema checking is or
> > > > will be in libxml++?
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Hugo
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:51 AM, <tremmel gtec at
> > > > <mailto:tremmel gtec at>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >      Hello,
> > > >
> > > >      is there an easy way to use xsd validation instead of dtd
> > > >      validation in
> > > >      libxml++ ?
> > > >
> > > >      Regards, Christoph Tremmel