Re: [libxml++] License compatibility libxml++ and libxml2
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Clarke Adam <Adam Clarke thomson net>
- Cc: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: [libxml++] License compatibility libxml++ and libxml2
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 09:20:01 +0200
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 09:37 -0700, Clarke Adam wrote:
> I noticed that libxml2 has moved to the MIT license,
It think it has always been MIT.
> are there any plans to move libxml++ to the MIT license?
> Does the dependency upon gtkmm complicate matters?
No, I don't know of any particular need for it to be MIT licensed.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
