Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] parametrizing libxml++ for the character /string type

[Christophe de VIENNE <cdevienne alphacent com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le Mercredi 29 Janvier 2003 16:42, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 16:15, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > We must fix these memory leaks before we can think of applying the
> > > patch.
> >
> > well, I was under the impression that you'd put these changes into
> > an 'unstable' branch.
>
> Yes, but even in the unstable branch there's no point in applying major
> stuff unless we know it's going to work completely.
>
> Actually, _I_ started to think that we might even get this into 1.0 if
> it proves itself quickly enough.
>


Hi,

What I can do right now is to create a stable branch BRANCH_1_0 in CVS. It 
would become, very soon, the 1.0 version.
The patchs proposed by Stefan would go in the HEAD version. If it proves 
itself quickly, we would merge the branches before doing the 1.0 version. If 
not, it will wait the 1.2 version, and the intermediate releases will be 
versionned 1.1.x

Does it sound good for you ?

Stefan, since you're actively partipating to libxml++ now, I can give you 
access to the CVS for a while. Even if the new concepts you're bringing are 
not yet production ready, we seems to agree on including them for future 
releases.

One more thing : since C member instance are pointers to structure each time, 
it would be very easy now to apply the pimpl idiom, which wouldn't be a bad 
thing I think.

Cheers,

Christophe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj45RyAACgkQB+sU3TyOQjCsWQCfXlwKqisATHEBQAwc2bPYySNk
1z8AoNj7x7LbsbWpeteZuxWFkMosanIY
=baEp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----