Re: [libxml++] node iterators

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 18:32, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'm now thinking that ForwardContainer migh be a better choice of STL
> concept to model, as it has fewer requirements so might be simpler to
> implement 1) while still supporting an STL-style interface. This would
> mean you can get an iterator from any Node, not just from some container
> type.

Could you give us a URL explaining "ForwardContainer"?

> I'm going to think more about this over the weekend, look at xmlwrapp
> again, and maybe look at how some examples of use would differ with the
> two proposals.

Wonderful.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com