Re: [libxml++] node iterators

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 19:01, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> agreed. In fact, the more I think about suggestion 2) the more I like
> it: the 'Node' class has a 'get_children()' and a 'get_attribute()'

children() and attributes() would be better, because they are accessors
rather than getters - If it was get_children() then I might expect to
have to use set_children() again after making changes. This is what we
do for gtkmm.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com